If we look at the recommendations of the sub-committee to the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police at the end of Community Safety Round Table (February 2006), or if we look at the key presentation at the same occasion by Daniel Sansfaçon, Deputy Director General, International Centre for the Prevention of Crime, we realize that No community left Behind is a timely initiative that is going in the right direction.
The portions where Mr. Sansfaçon's recommendations almost exactly match with NCLB approach and work are highlighted. Without the collaborative approach of the partners organizations working differently together, NCLB would not have reached where it stands today in the Banff Avenue community.
The Phase-II of NCLB — the expansion phase — will further consolidate this work. However, this is the time that partner organizations need to look at the progress they have made so far and try to build on it. As a quick reminder, the core components of the NCLB from the beginning are: Social mobilization; law enforcement, neighbourhood restoration and community policing.
Social mobilization is the over-arching component. From the record number of community members participating in the program activities, it can be safely conclude that adult population has reached level 7 on a 10 point scale in terms of mobilization and building trust with Ottawa Police Service and other partners. However, as far the youth are concerned, their participation level is good, but they still seem to be stuck at level 2 in terms of opening communication channels and building trust.
The partners engaged in implementing the NCLB initiative have made good progress in the right direction. Feedback from the law enforcement officials, crime prevention experts in academia and community development specialists suggest that this is a sound model in terms of its approach. The partners on the Steering Committee have great potential to make this initiative unique. They already undertake many activities which are – or may be – contributing to crime prevention any way.
The partner organizations and individuals now need to strategically think of building on the momentum they have gained so far to make the initiative more integrated by effectively involving all partners in multiple interventions in an interconnected way.
A quick review of the progress against the indicators set from the beginning of the initiative will give the partners an idea about future steps. There are lessons for the Steering Committee in the Mr. Sansfaçon's presentation. At the same time this and recommendations from the Community Safety Roundtable for crime prevention through social development simply reassure the partners that they are moving in the right direction.